Anti-Japanese Protests in Beijing, and the History of Diaoyu Protests

Three suitably breathless Global Times articles and photo galleries are linked below, but for a sane appraisal of at least part of what is going on, I recommend MIT professor M. Taylor Fravel’s September 15 article.  Respectively, the articles below deal with the protests in Beijing, Ferraris at the protests in Beijing, and the newly-publicized “40-year social movement” to protect Diaoyu/Senkakus with liberal borrowing from Taiwan’s archives.  Unfortunately, none of this seems to get at what happened in San Francisco in 1951 and what the PRC said about the issue then, but then again, that is what Cold War historians of East Asia (like myself) are supposed to do.

About these ads

5 thoughts on “Anti-Japanese Protests in Beijing, and the History of Diaoyu Protests

  1. I love how every photo in the first link references “Japan’s so-called “control.” Making a territorial claim is one thing, but even if your claim is a good and legitimate one, challenging effective control particularly through force, does not put you on the right side of international law/norms.

    • Thanks for the insight, Corey. Your own take on the matter is much more extensive and well-thought out than my own: http://sigma1.wordpress.com/2012/09/15/senkaku-shoto-2012-round-2/

      I do agree with your analysis in that piece (as with the longer NYT piece on Xi’s reappearance) that there is absolutely certaily a linkage between Politburo goings-on and the allowance — indeed, the outright encouragement — of these protests. Of course that sort of thing is about impossible to measure, so we’re left wondering about things like what these incidents do to China’s claims of moral legitimacy and “soft power” in East Asia. My view on the latter question (and I think my colleague Just Recently would agree with me) is that the whole PRC “soft power” apparatus is there more or less as a shield, not as a proactive measure, so little is lost in these circumstances anyway, if that makes sense. As long as folks at home believe we are influential in more than military ways abroad, that’s all that counts.

      • Actually I am right now preparing tomorrow’s lecture on Chinese “soft power” and I have become somewhat more half-hearted about the concept as applied to China over the last few days, funnily enough!

  2. is that the whole PRC “soft power” apparatus is there more or less as a shield, not as a proactive measure, so little is lost in these circumstances anyway, if that makes sense

    Agreed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s